The following ruling is important, so follow those links and read the complaint and decision. And please be sure you have an attorney who knows prison law, folks, if you have lost a loved one inside, or are trying to save one still.
If you need a list of lawyers who have sued the AZ DOC, one is here (pg1) and here (pg2).
I compiled it myself for prisoners and their families to find help, not for the lawyers to get clients - they didn't even ask me to list them - nor are there any guarantees that they will be great. Just interview them yourselves, and trust your better judgement.The firm litigating this case isn't on my list yet, so I'll put them down here - kudos to them for salvaging this claim.
The Leader Law Firm
John P Leader, Esq.
1715 E. Skyline Dr., #121
Tucson, AZ 85718
Phone (520) 575-9040
05/18/19 UPDATE see the current campaign to oust Charles Ryan from the AZ DOC - same old story year after year and no one has the guts to deal with him, still. poor @dougducey probably wont sack him even now...
PHOENIX (CN) - Arizona may be liable for claims filed on behalf of a
prison inmate who was assaulted by two others while a prison guard
escorted them through "no man's land," a back-alley area without
cameras, the 9th Circuit ruled Monday.
Marty Cortez filed suit
against Arizona and Bill Skol, the prison guard, in 2009 for
failure-to-protect and negligence on behalf of her now-deceased son,
Philip.
On Nov. 16, 2007, officers applied belly chains -- but
not leg irons, as allegedly required by prison policy - to move Cortez,
Juan Cruz, and Steven Lavender from the detention unit to the visitation
building. Skol, a visitation officer, was responsible for escorting
inmates between the two structures.
While in "no man's land" - a
back alley hidden from cameras and non-escorting officers - Cruz and
Lavender attacked Cortez and stomped on the back of his head as he lay
on the ground, handcuffed. Skol allegedly used pepper spray on Cruz and
Lavender, but did not physically intervene in the attack, which
allegedly lasted for five minutes.
Cortez suffered a brain
injury from the assault, was granted clemency and released from prison.
He later died of an apparent drug overdose.
The defendants filed
motions for summary judgment, and a magistrate judge found that the
evidence supported her claims. U.S. District Judge Jennifer Zipps disagreed, however, and found for Skol and Arizona.
"Given
the inherently risky environment in which plaintiff Cortez's injuries
occurred, there is no material issue of fact regarding whether plaintiff
Cortez was exposed to an unreasonable risk, nor is there evidence to
suggest that it was highly probable that harm would result," Zipps
wrote.
Cortez promptly appealed. On Monday, the 9th Circuit held
that there was enough evidence to show the "high-security" inmates were
undermanned, and that Skol acted with indifference to Cortez's safety.
The
opinion written by U.S. Circuit Judge Michelle T. Friedland, on behalf
of a three-judge panel, noted that Skol admitted to an investigator that
he overhead "a lot [of] talk and harassing words between the three
inmates in the back cage," had reason to know that Cortez was in
protective custody and was at risk for attack by other prisoners, and
knew that prison policy required leg restraints.
"Skol's
admitted awareness of the policy, combined with the prison
administrators' testimony regarding its effect, raises a genuine issue
as to whether Skol proceeded with the escort despite knowing that the
inmates were not properly restrained," Friedland wrote.
Since
there was enough evidence to show Skol acted with "deliberate
indifference" toward Cortez, the State of Arizona still faces negligence
claims against it, the panel said.
"Because we have concluded
that there are material fact disputes with respect to deliberate
indifference, and because Arizona's gross negligence standard is lower
than the federal deliberate indifference standard, we necessarily
conclude that there are also material fact disputes with respect to
gross negligence," Freidland wrote. "Indeed, in addition to being
responsible for Skol's behavior, the State may also be liable for the
aggregate conduct of other prison staff."
Johann Hari Author of 'Chasing The Scream: The First and Last Days of the War on Drugs'
Posted:
Updated:
For the past few months, I
have been watching the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter as it exposes the
unpunished killings of African-Americans -- Trayvon and Michael and
Eric, and all the other names that never make the news, because there
are so many, and it never seems to stop. I had a very personal reason
for watching it so closely. For most of my adult life, and for the past
three years especially, I have been spending a lot of time with another
minority group. All over the world, they are being killed or left to
die, with nobody being punished, and nobody being called to account.
There have even been government officials who suggest their deaths are a
good thing
.
There will be some people reading this who shrug
when members of this minority die, and say they brought it on
themselves. I am talking about addicts, who I spent a lot of time with
for my new book, Chasing The Scream: The First and Last Days of the War on Drugs. I would like to propose today the hashtag #AddictsLivesMatter, because we need to change how we think about them.
Here's
a story I stumbled across that, to me, distills the darkest attitude we
have fostered towards addicts in our culture -- the one that has been
created by the drug war, and has been in place for a century this year.
In
Phoenix, Arizona, I went to a prison called Tent City. It is a slew of
tents in the desert behind barbed wire, and I went out in the sweaty
Arizona sun with the prison's female chain gang, who are forced to wear
t-shirts saying "I Was A Drug Addict" and dig graves. The guards force
these women to chant rhymes that state they will be electrocuted if they
show any "lip." It's not an idle threat: I met the father of a man who
was killed with a taser in this prison, on camera, when he was offering no resistance.
I
talked with the women about their lives as they wiped the sweat from
their brows. One of them, Karen, was in her early forties and had a
quiet, girlish voice as she stuttered her story about being violently
abused by men all her life, and how the only thing that had ever made
her feel any relief was drugs.
I also spoke with the women who
work on prisoners' rights in Arizona, and I asked them one of my stock
journalistic questions: What have you seen over the years that shocked
you? One of them, Donna Leone Hamm of the excellent organization Middle Ground Prison Reform,
started to reel off a long list, and a while into her list she
mentioned the time they put a woman in a cage and cooked her, and then
carried on. I asked her to stop, and go back a second. What did they do?
When
Prisoner Number 109416 woke up in her cell in Perryville State Prison
on May 19th 2009 she was suicidal. The prison doctor said she was just
trying to get out of her cell. They took 109416 and put her in an
uncovered outdoor cage. And they left her there. According to witnesses,
she begged for water. She shat herself. She started to scream
deliriously. And then she collapsed. By the time the ambulance arrived,
her internal organs had been cooked, as if in an oven.
And here's the thing. Nobody was ever criminally punished.
Because she was an addict. Because she didn't matter.
Almost
nothing was known about Prisoner Number 109416 except that she was in
and out of prison either for having meth, or for prostituting herself to
get it, so I set off on a journey across the US to find out who she
really was. The story -- which you can find in the book -- tells us a
lot about the drug war. Her real name was Marcia Powell and, as I
learned from the father of her son, there were moments in her life when
she got clean and recovered, only to be busted for old drug charges and
to spiral back onto the road that ended in a desert cage.
This
story is extreme, but as I learned on my long journey from Mexico to
Vietnam, it is only the sharpest tip of the spear that is jabbed at
addicts every day, across most of the world. It has been there since the
start of the drug war. This war was launched in the 1930s by a man
called Harry Anslinger, the head of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, who
was driven by an obsessive hatred of addicts. He treasured a poem that
said he could only retire when "the last addicts died."
One of the
people he took his rage out on was Billie Holiday. He had her stalked
by his agents and sent to prison. He had her stripped of her ability to
perform anywhere that alcohol was served. When she collapsed with liver
cancer, his agents arrested her on her hospital bed. They handcuffed her
to the bed. They confiscated her record player. They banned her friends
from seeing her. People protested outside with signs saying "Let Lady
Live." When her methadone was cut off, she went into withdrawal and
died.
And here's where #BlackLivesMatter and #AddictsLivesMatter
meet. When Anslinger found out Judy Garland was a heroin addict, he
didn't have her stalked and killed. He told her to take longer
vacations, and reassured her studio she'd be fine. Can you spot the
difference between Billie and Judy? Can you spot the difference today
between the addicts in Beverley Hills who get compassionate rehab, and
the addicts in South Central who get cold jail cells?
Nobody
wishes the drug war on people they love -- white people, in Harry
Anslinger's case. Yet when it comes to the addicts we don't know, we
have chosen -- as a society -- a policy of mass caging instead of a
policy of compassion. Why? I interviewed Eric Sterling, the lawyer who
wrote the drug laws from the United States throughout the 1980s, and who
now bitterly regrets it and campaigns for sensible policies. He told me
about one meeting, at the height of the AIDS crisis, where he and a
group of senators were being briefed on how it was essential to
distribute clean needles, or all the addicts would die. Eric didn't
write down the words at the time, but he recalled that one of the
senator suggested a mass die-off of addicts would be a good thing. After
all, who wants addicts to survive?
It's important to stress that
most people who support the drug war don't think this way. They don't
want to kill addicts. They tell themselves that they are being harsh in
order to be kind -- that you have to threaten punishment in order to
encourage current addicts to stop, and to prevent other people from
falling down that dark well. I don't judge anyone for believing this --
it is based on compassion, and it has been backed with an enormous
amount of government propaganda for a hundred years.
But I would
urge anyone who sincerely believes this to look at the evidence. There
are places that have tried the punishment approach and addicts keep
dying in huge numbers. And there are places that have tried the
compassionate approach and addicts start to survive and recover in much
greater numbers. I have seen this all over the world, from Switzerland
to the North of England. To give just one example, in Portugal, after
they decriminalized all drugs and chose to spend the money on caring for
addicts instead, the rate of injecting drug use has fallen by 50
percent, and overdose and HIV transmission among addicts have come
crashing down.
To choose this better path, we have to undo a lot
of the assumptions that have been drilled into our heads. As Harry
Anslinger was stalking Billie Holiday, he was helping to invent a whole
new way of thinking about addicts -- as vampires, or zombies, or
predators. We have dehumanized people who get addicted to banned drugs
in a way we (thankfully) don't dehumanize people who get addicted to
legal drugs, like alcohol. We have to recover the ability to see the
humanity of addicts -- that they are people like us, with feelings and
dreams and the capacity to be heroic.
I learned about this from many people -- but nobody taught it to me more than a man called Bud Osborn.
In
the year 2000 Bud was a homeless street addict on the streets of the
Downtown Eastside of Vancouver. His neighborhood had the highest
concentration of addicts anywhere in North America. It was the place at
the end of the line in the city at the end of the line of the American
continent, and all around him, Bud's friends were dying. They would
shoot up behind dumpsters so the police wouldn't see them -- but if the
police can't see you, nor can anyone else, so if you start to OD, you
will be found days later, dead.
Bud decided he had to do something. But he also thought, What can I do? I am just a homeless junkie.
Then he had an idea. He gathered some addicts and proposed something simple. He asked them, Why don't we arrange a schedule, and patrol the alleyways ourselves? If we see one of us ODing, we can call an ambulance.
The
addicts started to do it and their death rates began to tumble. That
was great in itself, but it also meant they began to think about
themselves differently -- maybe we're not pieces of shit. Maybe we are people who can achieve things.
They started to turn up at public meetings to discuss The Menace Of The
Addicts, and they would sit at the back, and after a while, they would
put up their hands and explain they were The Addicts, and ask what they
could do differently. People complained they left needles lying around,
so the patrols were extended to collect discarded needles.
Bud
learned that in Frankfurt, Germany, they had opened safe injecting rooms
where people could use their drugs monitored by doctors, and that it
had massively reduced the death toll. So Bud and hundreds of other
addicts began to stalk Philip Owen, the right-wing mayor of Vancouver,
everywhere he went, carrying a coffin, asking how long it would be
before he ended the deaths.
Nobody had much optimism. Philip Owen
was a right-wing businessman from a rich family who had said that
addicts should be carted off to the local military base.
But then,
after protesting for years, something nobody expected happened. Philip
Owen wondered who the hell these people were, and he went to the
Downtown Eastside incognito, and he spent night after night talking with
addicts. And he was blown away. He had had no idea what their lives
were like.
So Philip Owen made an announcement. He held a press
conference with the police chief, the coroner, and the addicts, and he
announced they were opening the first injecting room in North America.
It opened, and Philip Owen's right-wing party was so appalled they
eventually deselected him, and his political career ended. He was
replaced by a left-wing candidate who kept the injecting room open.
But
the taboo was broken. And now the results are in. Ten years on, the
average life expectancy on the Downtown Eastside has improved by ten
years, and overdose is down by 80 percent. Philip Owen told me he would
do it all again in a heart beat.
Bud died last year. He was only
in his early sixties, but life as a homeless addict during a drug war,
before there was any help, had wrecked his body. For his memorial
service they sealed off the streets of the Downtown Eastside, where he
had once lived on the pavements, and enormous crowds gathered. There
were a lot of people in that crowd who knew they were alive because of
the uprising Bud began all those years before.
I learned so much
from my friendship with Bud, but here's what I learned more than
anything else: You never write anyone off. You never dismiss a human
being. You never can assume anyone is worthless. It's hard to think of
somebody with less power or respect than a homeless street addict -- but
Bud saved thousands of lives, and he changed his city forever.
If you are reading this and thinking, Yes,
the abuse of addicts is wrong, but what can we do? We all feel
powerless. We all feel sometimes like we can't make a difference. Then think of Bud. If we band together, we have so much more power than we realize.
Every
human has the capacity to be a hero -- including addicts. Every life
matters. Every addict's life matters. Marcia Powell deserved better than
being cooked in a cage. Billie Holiday deserved better than being
handcuffed on her deathbed. Bud deserved better than years on the
streets. In the twentieth century, we chose policies that kill addicts
over policies that save addicts. As year 101 of the drug war begins, we
have a chance to save the next Marcia, and Billie, and Bud. There is a
better way waiting for us -- if only we are ready to seize it.
Please
share your stories of addicts you have known, or addicts who have been
killed by our wrong approach, with the hashtag #AddictsLivesMatter.
Johann
Hari's book 'Chasing The Scream: The First and Last Days of the War on
Drugs' is published by Bloomsbury as a hardback, ebook and audiobook. To
find out where to buy it, or for more information, click here.
Johann
will be speaking and signing books at Politics and Prose in Washington
DC on the evening of the 29th Jan, the 92nd Street Y in NYC on the
lunchtime of the 30th Jan, Red Emma's in Baltimore on the 4th Feb, and
at Ben McNally bookstore in Toronto (with Naomi Klein) on the 11th Feb.
Hooray!The state will no doubt want to refile charges, so stay tuned. I suspect this isn't over...
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 10:20 AM Subject: ACLU News: Monica Jones Conviction Overturned
Good afternoon,
Crystal here from the ACLU, writing to inform you that Monica Jones’
conviction for manifesting intent to solicit prostitution was overturned
today by the Superior Court of Arizona.
Jones was arrested and charged in May 2013 under a Phoenix law that the
ACLU and others have argued is unconstitutional. In April 2014 she was
convicted and then in August of that year she appealed her conviction.
The ACLU filed an amicus brief in support of
her appeal and has been supporting her since her arrest. Here is a
background blog on her case:
https://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/when-walking-down-street-crime.
Monica Jones comment:
“Today is a great day! My wrongful conviction under the Phoenix
manifestation law was vacated this morning. I am so grateful to my legal
team and all of my supporters across the country and world. My
conviction being vacated is important but it is a small win
in our larger fight for justice. There are so many trans women and
cisgender women who might be charged under this law in Phoenix and
similar laws across the country. There is so much more work that needs
to be done so that no one will have to face what I
have no matter who they are or what past convictions they have.”
Comments from legal team:
Jean-Jacques “J” Cabou, a partner at the law firm of
PerkinsCoie
who represented Monica in her appeal and argued her case, said: “Monica
was convicted in an unconstitutional trial, under an unconstitutional
law, of a crime she didn’t commit. We are incredibly
pleased that the appellate court agreed that Monica was
unconstitutionally denied the presumption of innocence and that the
court vacated her conviction.”
Chase Strangio,
a staff attorney with the ACLU’s LGBT & HIV Project, who has been
working with Monica for
the past year and a half, said: “Like so many trans women of color,
Monica Jones was profiled and targeted by police for walking down the
street. Today’s reversal of her conviction is an important validation of
Monica’s brave fight to be seen and treated like
a human being.”
Dan Pochoda,
senior counsel at the ACLU of Arizona, who has also been working on
Monica’s case, noted:
“Monica Jones was targeted by law enforcement after her public
opposition to the coercive treatment of sex workers by Project ROSE. The
demise of this Project is based on the inaccurate claim that most adult
sex workers are "trafficked" is further vindication
of Monica.”
UPDATE 05/19/19 current campaign (over the SOS happening still)
#DARTHryan #DarkSideRyan
#CHUCKCHUCK#DELIBERATEindifferenceKILLS
(I actually doubt @dougducey has the balls to #FIREChuckRyan but we should tell him to anyway)
UPDATE (1/25/15 3:20pm)
I've heard from Neil's family since the post below, and they confirm he was murdered at ASP-Kingman/Cerbat. The AZ DOC should have cracked down on ASP-Kingman over the proliferation of drugs and violence there after the escape of John McClusky and friends, but by the sound sof things, it all only got worse once the spotlight was off this private prison.
Neil's mom has posted this message on her facebook, and has asked folks to share it far and wide.
(Neil Early 7/11/1991-1/19/2015) We are the parents of Neil Early who was murdered in the Kingman Prison
on Monday 1/19/15. Neil was only 23 years old. There are many untruths
going on and we want to clarify a few details.
Neil wasn’t a bad man, misguided, but he wanted to do the right thing.
He was in prison, doing 5 years and had 15 months left on his term. He
was convicted of Drug Paraphernalia and Conspiracy to Commit Retail
Theft. This meant that he stole some video games from two different
stores and resold them for money. Stupid yes, but he shouldn’t have to
die for a mistake he was already paying for. He now will never be a son
again, a big brother, a cousin, or a father to his child. The family
needs to know what happened to him! This should not be covered up! We
are understandably very angry and need answers. He shouldn’t have had a
death sentence for his mistakes!
The family is requesting anyone with ANY information please contact us:
Email: NeilEarly@bcaz.com Website: NeilEarly.com The Early Family PO Box 1138 Black Canyon City, AZ 85324
Original Post (1/21/15 6:41am)
Arizona state prison officials have kept the recent death of 23 year old ASP-Kingman prisoner Neil Early on the down low since it happened. My condolences to the family; I hope you sue - that's the only way you'll ever get to the truth. You sure can't trust the AZ DOC to get at it for you. Contact me if you don't know where to start: Peggy Plews at arizonaprisonwatch@gmail.com or 480-580-6807.
I'd also like to hear from anyone else who can fill in the blanks - all I don't know about this kid's life, his dreams, and such that I can't find out from the AZ DOC website; I know there was more to him than what meets the eye. Send me a better picture, too, if you can.
Folks at Prison Talk suggest that Neil's death was a homicide, but none of the media outlets have reported it as such, and the DOC has nothing on their site (though his AZDOC profile has been updated to show he passed away.) Sadly, it appears he was having trouble with substance use in custody, up until shortly before his death. His judge did recommend he go to Marana facility for substance abuse treatment when he was sentenced. It's a shame they think (or pretend as if) people actually get any care in prison. They should have taken one look at him and known he would be prey in there, instead. It's time we stop sending non-violent offenders like him to prison on minimum mandatory sentences. That could be done this year, if the legislature had the will.
An inmate's death Monday at a private prison near Kingman has
prompted an investigation from the Arizona Department of Corrections,
according to a statement from the agency.
Neil Early, 23, was
serving a sentence for two counts of organized retail theft and drug
paraphernalia charges from 2011 in Maricopa County.
Early was
sentenced to a 5-year prison term in May 2012 after having previously
served less than a year in 2010 for for theft charges.
The article below was posted from the AP to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch today. This was the comment I left for their readers: Corizon has been nothing but disastrous to Arizona state prisoners, ignoring too many to death and leaving their families devastated. We've had a whistleblower speak out and a class action lawsuit here (Parsons v Ryan), exposing how evil they are - as well as numerous protests by prisoners' loved ones and interviews with survivors, but it has been to no avail.
Some think that's due to Good Old Boy Terry Stewart's influence in AZ (he's the former AZ DOC director - Chuck Ryan's mentor - now in bed with the folks at Corizon Healthscare), but I can't explain why other states still have contracts with them. Voters should really scrutinize things closely if their jails or prison systems are going with these folks and renewing contracts year after year, there's probably something dirty going on that keeps them sucking your tax dollars up for their profits at the expense of some of your most vulnerable citizens. Stop the privatization all together, if you can. It doesn't deliver what it promises, and you'll end up paying more after too many die in the end.
Posted as Peggy Plews God only knows why the new governor, Doug Ducey, has retained Chuck Ryan after the embarassment his administration was to Brewer - must have something on that guy, too. It's like the whole Republican party here just dug their heads in the sand when it comes to the AZ DOC, though, not just the chiefs. Their mascot should be an ostrich, not an elephant. Elephants are, after all, thoughtful, compassionate, and wise...
By the way, if you're fighting these bastards on behalf of a loved one at the AZ DOC, follow the links to these older pieces, but be sure to be current on the relevant AZDOC policies (Department Orders) and send them the right copies - the docs and links in these old posts have probably expired.
Months after he landed in Florida’s Manatee County Jail, Jovon
Frazier’s pleas for treatment of intense pain in his left shoulder were
met mostly with Tylenol.
“I need to see a doctor!” he wrote on
his eighth request form. “I done put a lot of sick calls in & ya’ll
keep sending me back and ain’t tell me nothing.”
Four months
later, after Frazier’s 13th request resulted in hospitalization and
doctors diagnosed bone cancer, his arm was amputated, according to a
lawsuit by his family.
But the cancer spread. Frazier died in 2011 at age 21, months after his release.
As
an inmate, his medical care had been managed not by the county
sheriff’s office that runs the jail, but by a private company under
contract.
That company, Corizon Health Inc., is under growing
pressure after the loss of five state prison contracts, downgrades by
analysts and increasing scrutiny of its care of inmates held by some of
its largest customers, including New York City.
Corizon,
responsible for 345,000 inmates in 27 states, including Missouri, is the
country’s biggest for-profit correctional health provider, but it’s
just one of many firms vying for billions of public dollars spent on
prisoner care.
Corizon was established in 2011 when privately
held Valitás Health Services Inc., the Creve Coeur-based parent of
Correctional Medical Services Inc., acquired America Service Group Inc.,
a Tennessee-based provider of prison health services.
With corporate headquarters in Brentwood, Tenn., Corizon touts Creve Coeur as home to its operational headquarters.
For-profit
prison care raises questions about ceding public responsibilities to
private companies. It turns, though, on a thornier issue: How do you
ensure care of people who society mostly would prefer not to think
about?
Inmates “are still human beings. I think some people
forget that, I really do. They’re somebody’s child,” said Shirley
Jenkins, Frazier’s grandmother.
PRIVATIZED CARE
States
spend $8 billion a year, a fifth of their corrections budgets, on
prison health care, according to the Pew Charitable Trusts and the
MacArthur Foundation. Local jails spend millions more.
Some critics fault the idea of privatizing the job.
“The
problem is a structure that creates incentives to cut corners and deny
care to powerless people that have no other options,” said David Fathi,
director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Prison
Project.
Others say deficiencies with prison care go beyond whether it is privatized.
“I
don’t have a great love for private health care ... but I don’t think
that they’re the source of the problem,” said Dr. Marc Stern, former
health services director for Washington state’s prisons. Stern, who once
worked for a Corizon predecessor in New York state, issued a 2012
report criticizing the company’s care of Idaho prison inmates while
serving as a court-appointed expert.
“I think the problem is how much money and effort we are willing to put into correctional health care,” Stern said.
Some critics, though, say Corizon is notably problematic.
“We
get letters from prisoners about medical care not being provided, and
the list is endless. And it’s increased tremendously since Corizon took
over,” said Randall Berg, executive director of the Florida Justice
Institute, who represents inmates petitioning for care.
Corizon says it strives to provide quality care.
“We
are always troubled by any questions on the care provided to our
patients and view this as an opportunity to reconfirm our commitment to
operational ethics and professionalism,” company spokeswoman Susan
Morgenstern said in a written statement. The company declined to answer
questions.
The criticism surrounding Corizon isn’t new.
Correctional Medical Services, or CMS, which later became Corizon, was
the main subject of a 1998 Post-Dispatch investigation of for-profit
prison health care providers. Looking at CMS and other firms, the
investigation found more than 20 cases nationwide in which inmates died
as a result of alleged negligence, indifference, understaffing,
inadequate training or cost-cutting.
In 2012, Corizon was sued
for alleged medical missteps in the death of Courtland Lucas, an inmate
in the St. Louis jail. He died May 25, 2009, from complications of a
heart problem, congenital aortic valve stenosis, while under the care of
CMS. The lawsuit was settled in the fall of 2014, but the terms were
not disclosed.
Corizon’s struggles are widespread.
Its
care of the 11,000 inmates at New York City’s Rikers Island is under
“comprehensive review” by officials, who say they are concerned about
problems including at least 16 deaths since 2009.
Arizona hired
Corizon last year to replace Wexford Health Sources Inc. after its care
came under fire. But an advocacy group warned that “if anything, things
have gotten worse” in state prisons. Arizona and the ACLU recently
reached a settlement calling for more monitoring of inmate care.
Meanwhile
Corizon has lost long-standing prison contracts in Minnesota, Maine,
Maryland, Tennessee and Pennsylvania since 2012. Auditors in three
states documented problems, including slowness to address poor
recordkeeping and inmates’ urgent requests for off-site care.
Corizon,
which generated $1.4 billion in revenue in 2013 and is owned by a
Chicago private equity firm, has battled stiffening competition. In
recent months, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s have downgraded
Corizon’s holding company, citing financial underperformance, contract
losses and competition that has squeezed profits.
The connection between Corizon’s contract losses and questions about the quality of care it provides is not clear.
But
the challenges are evident in Florida, where a year after the state
privatized prison care and awarded Corizon a $1.2 billion contract, news
reports point to rising inmate deaths. If the company does not address
substandard care, the state’s corrections commissioner wrote to
Corizon’s CEO in September, Florida may begin withholding payment.
In
Minnesota, an audit last year found that inadequate communication
between prison staff and Corizon doctors during overnight hours “may
have been a contributing factor to inmate deaths.”
But in
announcing Minnesota’s change of contractors, the corrections
commissioner said Corizon had provided “excellent” service. In a written
response to questions, the state corrections department said its
decision was not related to the audit. It would not comment on inmate
deaths.
Corizon’s work in local jails also has come under scrutiny.
In
October, Volusia County, Fla., officials questioned Corizon executives
about lawsuits and its financial stability before voting unanimously to
switch contractors. The hearing was held in the shadow of a lawsuit
filed locally by the family of Tracy Veira, an inmate who choked to
death in 2009 in a cell where she was supposed to be under watch while
detoxing from painkillers.
A nurse working for one of the
companies that merged to form Corizon saw an ailing Veira in the jail’s
clinic the afternoon before she died. She told a supervisor the inmate
looked as if she needed hospitalization, but Veira was instead sent back
to her cell, according to an affidavit filed in the case.
When
the commissioners questioned Corizon’s executives, there was no mention
of Veira. But Commissioner Deb Denys said she was mindful of the case,
scheduled for a July trial.
“I think everybody was,” Denys said. “Sometimes you don’t state the obvious.”
Jennifer Mann of the Post-Dispatch contributed to this report.
.JPG)